Dupree v. Virginia Home Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Petition to Rehear — Agent—Evidence—Newly discovered Evidence— Witness. This was a PETITION to Reheab, by the defendant, filed at the October Term, 1885, of the Supreme Court. The case is reported in 92 N. C., 417. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The argument upon the rehearing of the errors assigned, protracted over the entire period allowed by the rule, has been little more than the reproduction of that made upon the first hearing, which was full and exhaustive upon the numerous exceptions contained in the record, both orally and in the brief. With this aid, the case was then in all its details, carefully considered and decided. Our convictions produced by that discussion, and our'examination of the authorities, as embodied in the opinion then formed and delivered, remain unchanged. We do not feel called upon to go over the same…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Matthews v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Carson v. . DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Bledsoe v. . Nixon .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Holmes, Ex'r v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Dibbrell v. Georgia Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.