Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. United States
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 8, 1977No. CIV-75-0218-BPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOHANON, District Judge.
This cause came before the Court Friday, March 18, 1977, upon plaintiffs’ “Application to Clarify Plaintiff Class” in the above-captioned class action. Plaintiffs requested that the Court enter Orders certifying the plaintiff class as including “all victims of cancer and their spouses who are responsible for the cost of treatment,” and declaring as members of the plaintiff class all persons certified by a physician as having cancer. Defendants argued that plaintiff does not represent a class within the meaning of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Mabel Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Gold Strike Stamp Company, a Utah Corporation v. A. Sherman Christensen, District Judge, B. Delos Gardner, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robert W. Bradford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hagen v. City of WinnemuccaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- National Gypsum Co. v. Kirbyville Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
- McHan v. GrandboucheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.