Legal Opinion
McHan v. Grandbouche
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 29, 1983No. 79-4257PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This is a diversity action in which plain- ' tiff claims that he was defrauded by the defendants. This matter is presently before the court upon the following motions: (1) plaintiff’s motion for class action certification (Doc. # 67); (2) defendants’ motion for a more definite statement (Doc. # 72); and (3) plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (Doc. # 76). The court has heard oral argument on these motions and is now prepared to rule. In addition, the court shall consider whether defendant John Grandbouche should be held in contempt for failure to comply…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Zapata v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Seiler v. E.F. Hutton & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Shields v. KeatingDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1992
- Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.