Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fassinger v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1995No. 64A04-9503-CR-107Published

1DissentSteaton, Judge

This is a dissent from the rationale relied upon by the Majority. In this appeal, the rationale vehicle is more important than the resultant destination. I agree with the result but disagree with the rationale to achieve it. Under the Majority's rationale, jeopardy will attach in a tax case when a party's tax protest is rejected by the tax court or when a request for refund is denied. Maj. at 1167. However, I would conclude that assessment of a civil sanction should not prohibit subsequent eriminal prosecution for two reasons:

1. IND.CODE § 6-7-3-9 (1998) specifically states that payment of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Haggar Co. v. Helvering, Com'r of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Detterline v. BonaventuraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Katner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API