Legal Opinion

Katner v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1995No. 49S05-9503-CV-00348PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*347ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SELBY, Justice.

We are called upon to determine whether Indiana's forfeiture statute, Ind.Code § 34-4A-30.1-1 (West 1991), requires the State to demonstrate a nexus between property sought by the State in forfeiture and an underlying drug offense. We conclude that the statute requires such a nexus and grant transfer in order to resolve an apparent inconsistency between Caudill v. State (1993), Ind.App., 613 N.E.2d 433 and Katner v. State (1994), Ind.App., 640 N.E.2d 388.

FACTS

On January 31, 1992, after a traffic stop and a violent altercation with police, Simon Katner was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Commonly Known as 916 Douglas Avenue, Elgin, Illinois, Appeal of Paul F. Born, Iii, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Danforth v. Acorn Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Lloyd G. Perry v. Anonymous Physican 1, Alias Medical Group 1, Inc., Anonymous Physican 2Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Serrano v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API