Legal Opinion

Kao v. Haldeman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1999PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by allowance from an 'order of Superior Court which affirmed an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County denying, in part, injunctive relief sought by the appellants, Dr. Chi-Chien Kao and his wife Dr. Te Hua Liu, Carol C. Snyder, and Terry Hummel. Appellants own an easement for a private road that serves their properties, and they seek to prevent a nearby property owner from trespassing thereon.

The easement, which is located in the Borough of Langhorne, is known as West Watson Avenue. See map, infra. The width of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. First National Bank v. PaffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Taylor v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Schmoele v. BetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Kanefsky v. Dratch Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Roundy's Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Landis, J. & D. v. Wilt, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Carolyn J. Carlson, Trustee of the Carolyn J. Carlson Living Trust v. Latvian Lutheran Exile Church of Boston and Vicinity Patrons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  5. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API