Kanefsky v. Dratch Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
This controversy is over defendants’ right to use a driveway which is located in the rear of plaintiffs’ houses.
Dratch Construction Company, one of the defendants, owned a plot of ground in the City of Philadelphia constituting the easterly half of a square city block bounded by Rugby Street on the east, PhilEllena Street on the south, Woolston Avenue on the west, and Yernon Road on the north. Its property ran for a distance of about 729 feet along Rugby Street and extended in depth toward Woolston Avenue for a distance of approximately 115 feet. In…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Sullivan v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Percy A. Brown & Co. v. RaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Coleman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Moyerman v. GlanzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Brown v. VossWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- BIG BASS LAKE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. WarrenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Peters v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Kao v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.