Beaulieu Vineyard v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of Napa County. H. C. Gesford, Judge. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The proceeding is for a writ of prohibition. An alternative writ was issued upon a verified petition. On the return day respondent filed a demurrer and also an answer denying many of the allegations of the petition. Thereafter petitioners filed a traverse of the answer; and respondent—not to be outdone in volume of asseveration and denial—replied with a “rejoinder to the traverse.”
We do not deem it necessary to give special consideration to the demurrer of respondent. It is true that a sharp issue is presented as to some of the facts, but notwithstanding this want of agreement between the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Camron v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Holland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Laguna Salada Union Elementary School District v. Pacific Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Lange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.