Legal Opinion

Lange v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1909No. Civ. No. 618PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition to the Superior Court of Solano County. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Petitioners are two of the defendants in • an action pending in said superior court in which the Vallejo. Ferry Company (a corporation) is plaintiff.

In the complaint the said corporation, among other things,, alleged “that on the eighteenth day of March, 1896, the city of Vallejo by Ordinance No. 132 of ordinances of said city” (a copy of the ordinance being set out in the complaint) “inconsideration of the sum of $10,151 paid said city of Vallejo by one William Whitney, duly granted, sold and conveyed to said William Whitney and to his assigns, the franchise, right, privilege and authority…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Estate of JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Head v. DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Agassiz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Rowe v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Brush v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Yolo Water & Power Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API