Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Wilde
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 20, 1997PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 9, 1996, which ruled that claimant and others similarly situated were employees of Enesco Imports Corporation.
Claimant worked as a sales representative for Enesco Imports Corporation, a wholesaler of gift and collectible items. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was entitled to receive benefits after his employment by Enesco was terminated, finding that he had been an employee of Enesco and not an independent contractor. We affirm. This Court previously reviewed the nature of Enesco’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re Pepsi Cola Buffalo Bottling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re LuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of NeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hernandez v. Chefs Diet Delivery, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of StuckelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of BedinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of BedinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.