Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Rivera
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1986PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*682OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The orders of the Appellate Division in Rivera and Fox should be reversed, with costs, and the decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board reinstated and the order of the Appellate Division in Ross should be affirmed, with costs.
In each of these cases whether the relationships of the operators-deliverers with the delivery companies is that of employees or independent contractors involves a question of fact as to whether there is evidence of either control over the results produced or over the means used to achieve the results (Matter of Field Delivery…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Kirsch v. Fleet Street, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Carlson v. Am. Int'l Grp., Inc.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
- In re Pepsi Cola Buffalo Bottling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Claim of KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.