Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Neil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 25, 1990, which, inter alia, assessed Enesco Imports Corporation for unemployment insurance contributions.

The question of whether an employer/employee relationship exists is one of fact and depends on whether there is evidence of either control over the results achieved or over the means used to achieve those results (Matter of Rivera [State Line Delivery Serv. — Roberts], 69 NY2d 679, 682, cert denied 481 US 1049). Here, claimant was a sales representative for Enesco Imports Corporation and was assigned to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. In Re the Claim of CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In re the Claim of CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re the Claim of RawdinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WildeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of BraunsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of CullitenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API