Hettrick Manufacturing Co. v. Barish
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
This appeal raises solely the question of law whether a valid accord and satisfaction has been established by the defendant under the following circumstances:
*674Plaintiff sued to recover $380.59, balance of the original purchase price of merchandise sold and delivered to defendant. Defendant, claiming that the goods had been sold with a warranty that they would originate at mills in a certain section whereas they had been manufactured elsewhere, claimed to be entitled, under a contract of resale, to an offset for profits lost by reason of this disparity. These facts appear in a correspondence…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Jaffray v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Siwooganock Guaranty Savings Bank v. CushmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Hettrick Manufacturing Co. v. BarishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- In re the Estate of McCoyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Manson v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.