Legal Opinion

Hettrick Manufacturing Co. v. Barish

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

This appeal raises solely the question of law whether a valid accord and satisfaction has been established by the defendant under the following circumstances:

*674Plaintiff sued to recover $380.59, balance of the original purchase price of merchandise sold and delivered to defendant. Defendant, claiming that the goods had been sold with a warranty that they would originate at mills in a certain section whereas they had been manufactured elsewhere, claimed to be entitled, under a contract of resale, to an offset for profits lost by reason of this disparity. These facts appear in a correspondence…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Jaffray v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Yonkers Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Siwooganock Guaranty Savings Bank v. CushmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Hettrick Manufacturing Co. v. BarishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. In re the Estate of McCoyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. Manson v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API