Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Niles

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAngell, J.

The complaint seeks recovery of a balance due upon a conditional sale by plaintiff to defendants of two automobile trucks. Both parties Jo this controversy seem to desire that this motion to vacate the judgment which plaintiff has obtained by default and to dismiss the complaint should be determined under *819article 4 of the Personal Property Law entitled “ Uniform Conditional Sales Law.” That article was added to the Personal Property Law (repealing former article 4) by Laws of 1922, chapter 642, in effect September 1, 1922. The contract of conditional sale out of which this controversy grows…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Acme Glass Co. v. Woods-Lloyd Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erie Commercial Corp. v. ThenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Dickson v. NilesNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API