Legal Opinion

Rita Lamoureux v. MPSC, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 27, 2017No. 16-1402PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge'.

MPSC, Inc. was a start-up company with an innovative idea — the patented “Rinse & Chill service” — but no capital. An angel investor, John Lamoureux, provided the necessary capital in exchange for a royalty fee every time the company used its patented service. The contract specified three events that would terminate the agreement but did not specify a termination date. MPSC now asks the courts to supply an at-will termination term. The district court 2 declined to do so. We affirm.

I. Background

MPSC is a Minnesota corporation in the meat-processing business with its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Benson Cooperative Creamery Ass'n v. First District Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Joseph Friedberg v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Catamaran Corporation v. Towncrest PharmacyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Green Plains Otter Tail, LLC v. Pro-Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. Catamaran Corporation v. Towncrest PharmacyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Daniel Ayala v. CyberPower Systems (USA), Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  5. Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. v. Protiviti Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API