Legal Opinion
Aboudara v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1952No. Civ. No. 15156PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, J. pro tem.
This is an action to recover damages for injuries sustained on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant. The trial court found that the defendant was not negligent, and judgment was entered accordingly. From this judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
On the date of the accident appellant was riding as a passenger on a municipally owned bus operated by the defendant. The route of the bus was westerly on Market Street and thence to the Eichmond District in San Francisco. The accident occurred between 4:30 p.m. and 5 p.m. at the height of the commuter traffic. As the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Woodard v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Hassell v. BungeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beaupre v. NaveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- County of Los Angeles v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Abney v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953