Legal Opinion
O'Gorman v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 27, 2012No. 11 CV 02439PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
EDMOND E. CHANG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kevin O’Gorman filed this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Chicago, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for alleged violations of his right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.1 The City has moved to dismiss the complaint. R. 13. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted, but-O’Gorman has 21 days in which to file an amended complaint if he can, in good faith, make sufficient allegations consistent with this opinion.
I
At this stage of the litigation, we accept Plaintiffs allegations as…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taggart-Erkander v. Racine Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019