Legal Opinion

American Can Co. v. Lobdell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1982No. 116-721, CA 19605; No. 118,142, CA 19606PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Appellants, large industrial customers of Portland General Electric (PGE) and Pacific Power & Light (PP&L), brought suit under ORS 756.5801 to vacate and remand the Public Utility Commissioner’s (Commissioner’s) orders granting rate increases to PGE and PP&L, which intervened in the suit. Appellants alleged that the “rate spreads” adopted in those orders unlawfully discriminate against appellants because the spreads shift to them, as industrial customers, costs incurred by residential customers. The circuit court upheld the orders. See ORS 756.598. On appeal, appellants contend that 1) the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Can Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Publishers Paper Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Market Transport, Ltd. v. MaudlinOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Northwest Climate Conditioning Ass'n v. LobdellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Knutson Towboat Co. v. Oregon Board of Maritime PilotsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API