Legal Opinion

American Can Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 1977No. 87,551, CA 5283; 87,559, CA 5284; 88,519, CA 5291; 89,073, CA 5292PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, P. J.

These four cases have been consolidated for trial and appeal. The plaintiffs’ appeals are from an order of the circuit court affirming Public Utility Commissioner Order No. 74-658, which revised the rates of Pacific Power & Light Company (Pacific). Pacific appears as an intervenor.

A pretrial order and stipulation set forth the following facts agreed upon by all plaintiffs excluding E. D. Oliver:

"6. On December 27, 1973, Pacific filed with the Commissioner revised tariff schedules applicable to electric service in Oregon. The revised tariff schedules would have increased Pacific’s annual gross…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Midland Realty Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Application of Hawaii Elec. Light Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Klamath Off-Project Water Users, Inc. v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API