Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Masinter v. Markstein

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2002No. 01-129, 01-135PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] The district court denied owners in the Crescent H Subdivision the right to intervene in cases in which owners in neighboring McNeely Mountain and Fish Creek Meadows Subdivisions sued the successor in interest of the developer of both subdivisions to enforce fishing and recreational rights they claim the developer granted to them when they purchased their lots. Those rights involved riparian lands included within the Crescent H Subdivision. The district court denied the Crescent H owners' motions to intervene both as of right and permissively, and we affirm.

ISSUES

[T2] The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dellapenta v. DellapentaWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Curless v. CurlessWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Deisch v. JayWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ColleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. GunterWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Armstrong v. HrabalWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API