State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Colley
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
An insurer claiming an interest in a wrongful death cause of action appeals the district court’s denial of a motion to intervene. The insurer maintains that a judgment by default entered as a discovery sanction against an allegedly culpably negligent party prejudiced the insurer’s ability to protect its interest. The district court ruled that the insurer’s motion was not timely.
We affirm.
I.ISSUES
Appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, identifies the following issues:
I. Whether Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company had a right to intervene…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Teddy Ray DyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. GunterWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Masinter v. MarksteinWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Northfork Citizens for Responsible Development v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Hodges v. Lewis & Lewis, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Concerned Citizens of Spring Creek Ranch v. Tips Up, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.