Legal Opinion

Deisch v. Jay

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1990No. 89-57, 89-58PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

The major issue in this appeal concerns the nature of a residence builder-vendor’s implied warranty of workmanship and fitness for habitation given to the residence owner.

The builder-vendor of two townhouses appeals the court’s judgment awarding money damages to two homeowners in their action which alleged that the builder-vendor had negligently constructed their townhouses or had breached an implied warranty of workmanship and fitness for habitation. Cross-appealing, the two homeowners claim that they received inadequate damages awards.1

We affirm in all respects.

In its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. First Wyoming Bank, N.A. v. Continental Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Armstrong v. HrabalWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Harbel v. WintermuteWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Masinter v. MarksteinWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API