Deisch v. Jay
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
The major issue in this appeal concerns the nature of a residence builder-vendor’s implied warranty of workmanship and fitness for habitation given to the residence owner.
The builder-vendor of two townhouses appeals the court’s judgment awarding money damages to two homeowners in their action which alleged that the builder-vendor had negligently constructed their townhouses or had breached an implied warranty of workmanship and fitness for habitation. Cross-appealing, the two homeowners claim that they received inadequate damages awards.1
We affirm in all respects.
In its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- First Wyoming Bank, N.A. v. Continental Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Armstrong v. HrabalWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Harbel v. WintermuteWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Masinter v. MarksteinWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.