Legal Opinion

Larson v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 9, 1962No. 38,410PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting the defendant and cross-complainant, Settergren Hardware and Variety, a partnership, indemnity against defendant and cross-complainant, Penn-54th, Inc., which indemnity arose out of a judgment recovered by plaintiffs in a personal injury action against both of the above-named defendants and the city of Minneapolis. The defendant Penn-54th, Inc., is the owner of a shopping center in the city of Minneapolis. Settergren Hardware and Variety is one of its tenants. In the discussion which follows Penn-54th, Inc., will be referred to as the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Daly v. BergstedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API