Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1984No. C2-83-1858PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court which denied the defendant’s motion to vacate a writ of attachment. We affirm.
FACTS
On February 23, 1981 the respondent served upon the appellant a summons and complaint, alleging that the appellant had defaulted upon the payment of certain loan installments, which the respondent had been required to pay, as guarantor on the loan. On March 26, 1981 the respondent applied to the court for a writ of attachment, alleging that the appellant was working in South Dakota and was attempting to dispose of certain of his property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Bongard v. BongardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Trickel v. CalvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- International State Bank v. GamerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016