Legal Opinion

New York Telephone Co. v. Teichner

Suffolk County District Court

Decided March 6, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas J. Klei, J.

After trial, the court makes the following findings of fact:

The defendant’s husband, Albert Teichner, secured from the plaintiff the installation of a telephone station and facilities. A separation was effected between defendant and her husband, said Albert Teichner, in December, 1970. Prior to that time, all charges for such station and facilities were rendered against, and paid for, by the husband.

Thereafter, and prior to the 4th day of May, 1971, as alleged by the plaintiff, the defendant used said station and facilities thereby incurring liability for the cost of such services which the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. People v. SchenkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. The People Ex Rel. Dusenbury v. . SpeirNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Tausik v. TausikNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Harrigan v. CahillNew York Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  2. Custer Builders, Inc. v. Quaker Heritage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Beacon Syracuse Associates v. City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1983
  4. Kapral's Tire Service, Inc. v. Aztek Tread Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Maxwell Macmillan Realization Liquidating Trust v. Aboff (In re Macmillan, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API