Legal Opinion
Kapral's Tire Service, Inc. v. Aztek Tread Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: The court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
The facts indicate that Aztek Tread Corporation, doing business as American Tread Corp. (Aztek) entered into a contract with defendant Montgomery Ward & Company agree*1012ing to sell and deliver to Montgomery Ward certain quantities of retread tires. To fulfill this contract, Aztek contracted with plaintiff Kapral’s Tire Service, Inc. (Kapral) whereby Aztek would purchase tires from Kapral. Montgomery Ward was not in any way involved in the contract between Aztek and Kapral. Indeed, the Kapral/Aztek contract contained a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Schuler-Haas Electric Corp. v. Wager Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- New York Telephone Co. v. TeichnerSuffolk County District Court · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kagan v. K-Tel Entertainment, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Joan Hansen & Co. v. Everlast World's Boxing Headquarters Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Heller v. KurzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Laborers Local 17 Health & Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Sperry v. Crompton Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.