Legal Opinion
Tausik v. Tausik
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Lett, J.
These three actions were directed, by separate orders at Special Term, to be tried together. Affirmance by the Appellate Division of the second order resulted in the third action being joined for trial before me after the commencement of the trial of the other suits. It was stipulated that the proof presented would, where relevant, apply to all three cases.
The plaintiff in these actions is the husband. His wife is the principal defendant. By such actions, the husband seeks (1) a separation on the grounds of abandonment and cruel and inhuman treatment; (2) a declaratory judgment determining…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v. Lewis S. RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Ivancovich v. IvancovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- New York Telephone Co. v. TeichnerSuffolk County District Court · 1972
- Brenner v. LegumNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Susan W. v. Martin W.New York Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.