Legal Opinion
Mainelli v. Haberstroh
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 4, 1964No. Civ. 8197PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEALON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Mamie J. Mainelli and Nicholas Mainelli, her husband, brought suit against defendants, Alfred Haberstroh and Marie Haberstroh, d/b/a Hill Top Rest, to recover damages for injuries, sustained by Mamie J. Mainelli when she fell from a step while a paying guest at defendants’ resort boarding house. At the trial, plaintiffs’ evidence revealed that while Mamie J. Mainelli was departing from the dining room, she stepped out the front door onto a step consisting of a single slab of natural stone, the center of which was hollowed out into a depression estimated at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Imperial Oil, Limited v. Frank DrlikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Magee v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Petition of Gulf Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Di Salvo v. Cunard Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Herrera v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Warren Vanskike v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, and Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Delores Taken Alive v. Melvin LitzauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Morrissey v. Welsh Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.