Pelham v. Griesheimer
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a trial court order dismissing their amended complaint for attorney malpractice for failure to state a cause of action on the basis that there was no attorney-client relationship between the plaintiffs and defendant. We affirm.
Plaintiffs’ amended complaint contains the following factual allegations: that the defendant was retained as attorney for Loretta Ray to obtain a divorce from George Ray; that plaintiffs herein were minor children of the parties at the time of the divorce; that the decree of divorce, entered on June 22, 1971, contained a provision…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Cunis v. BrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Bank of Northern Illinois v. NugentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Marker v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Roppo v. Travelers CompaniesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Emery v. Kimball Hill, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.