Legal Opinion

Black v. Walter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated, in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The defendants Walter O. Ashley and John P. Clark were partners in' business, and owned the steamer Alaska, which they used in domestic commerce on the lakes between Sandusky, Ohio, and Detroit, this State. After this action was commenced John P. Clark died, and the cause was revived against Samuel S. Babcock, Charles Clark, and Everett N. Clark, his executors.

It appears that Freund Bros., Burnham, Stoepel & Co., and the Black Hardware Company were severally consignees of certain invoices of goods brought by the steamer Alaska from the city of Sandusky to Detroit in July, 1887, and deposited…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Noyes v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  3. Detroit & Bay City Railway Co. v. McKenzieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Feige v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Buckley v. Great Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. American Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Eaton v. GladwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fogarty v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Greenwich Ins. v. WatermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  5. Red River Cotton Oil Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API