Tatro v. Baker-Fisk-Hugill Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Jayne (Ira W.), J. Case by William H. Tatro against the Baker-FiskHugill Company for the loss of an automobile while in defendant’s possession for repairs. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case is here upon writ of error sued out by the defendant to review a judgment for the plaintiff in the court below. ' The action is trespass on the case brought by the plaintiff for himself, and for the use and benefit of the New Jersey Insurance Company, claiming damages for the loss of an automobile alleged to have been stolen while in the possession of the defendant for repairs. The defendant conducted an automobile sales agency, and was located on the east side of Woodward avenue in the city of Detroit, a short distance from the southeast corner of Alexandrine avenue. Immediately…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Knights v. PiellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Schurr v. SavignyMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Pennell v. Delta Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Lamb v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Agricultural Ins. v. ConstantineOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Gertler v. BowlingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
- Fox Chevrolet Sales, Inc. v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Checkpoint Foreign Car Service, Inc. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. Consolidated Garage & Sales Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.