State v. Waite
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellants, Lee Waite and Dewey Gilman, were convicted of the crime of attempted robbery. The information on which they were convicted charged an attempt to rob one Harry Bounds. The evidence introduced on behalf of the state tended to show that certain Chinese were conducting gambling rooms in the city of Seattle, on the second floor of a building known as the Bex Hotel. That, shortly before midnight of August 2,1924, the appellants, with others in concert with them, masked and armed, entered the rooms in which the gambling was conducted, pointed their arms at the proprietors and patrons…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- State v. CushingWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. WaiteWashington Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- State v. OrtegoWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. LunsfordWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BramesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.