Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 14, 1971No. 139-2, 147-2, 214-41061-2, 322-41116-2, 296-2PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C. J.

This is the case of the spontaneous robbery — at least that is the contention of defendants Rodney Ronald Reinhart, Cecil Grant Wilson, and John Lee Miranda. They maintain that they were unaware that a robbery had been planned. The primary question they present is whether the court’s instructions permitted them to effectively present their defense of unwitting participation in the robbery of LaPore’s ShopRite. The instructions did not advise the jury that proof of an intent to commit the crime is an essential element of the crime of robbery.

Their cases and the case of Frank F. Carter were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. State v. BorreroWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API