Legal Opinion

Kurn v. Immel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1939No. 28675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

The defendant in error, plaintiff below, brought suit against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants, to recover damages for the death of two cows alleged to have been caused from defendant’s failure to maintain a lawful fence along its right of way located on and through the premises occupied by the plaintiff.

The agreed and proven facts follow: That plaintiff’s cows entered upon the de-' fendant’s right of way, through its defective fence, and from the right of way entered an adjoining field owned by a third person, ate a quantity of green African millet, causing their death, from prussic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Champlin Refining Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Bear v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Ingalsbe v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  5. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. v. HotzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. KeirseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. KeirseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API