Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Keirsey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentBlackbird, Justice
I do not agree with the majority opinion. I think that the facts set forth in plaintiff’s petition, together with the inferences to be reasonably drawn therefrom, state a cause of action against the defendant, and therefore, that the judgment of the trial court should have been 'affirmed.
The exact wording of the statutes prescribing a railroad’s duty to erect and maintain fences along its right of way involved herein, Title 66, O.S.1951 § 141, is as follows:
“It shall be the duty of every person or corporation owning or operating any railroad in the State of Oklahoma to fence its road, except…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clark's v. HannibalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
- Gorman v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- State ex rel. Clinton County v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Busby v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.