Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Keirsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 19, 1954No. 35969Published

1DissentBlackbird, Justice

I do not agree with the majority opinion. I think that the facts set forth in plaintiff’s petition, together with the inferences to be reasonably drawn therefrom, state a cause of action against the defendant, and therefore, that the judgment of the trial court should have been 'affirmed.

The exact wording of the statutes prescribing a railroad’s duty to erect and maintain fences along its right of way involved herein, Title 66, O.S.1951 § 141, is as follows:

“It shall be the duty of every person or corporation owning or operating any railroad in the State of Oklahoma to fence its road, except…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clark's v. HannibalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Gorman v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  3. State ex rel. Clinton County v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Busby v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API