Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Smith
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1944No. 6700PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
Suit for an injunction. The defendants demurred to the complaint and the demurrer was sustained. Upon plaintiffs’ failure to plead over the complaint was dismissed. The correctness of the ruling on demurrer is questioned by this appeal.
From the complaint it appears that the plaintiffs are the duly elected Commissioners of the Utah State Bar. It is alleged that the defendants, doing business under the assumed name and style of Service Collection Company, are unlawfully practicing law in violation of Section 6-0-24, U. C. A. 1943. The suit is brought to enjoin further…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Niklaus v. Abel Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- J. H. Marshall & Associates, Inc. v. BurlesonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Frieson v. IsnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.