Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Hansen

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1894No. 15403PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This action was brought to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant M. Hansen appeals from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

In his complaint plaintiff avers that he agreed with defendants “ to furnish, and did furnish, the labor at their special instance and request in completing the foundation of said premises, build the chimneys, laying wall-plates, laying out building, underpinning walls, building scaffolding, carrying brick, completing brick walls and brick foundation upon said dwelling-house, upon said lot of land, and for all which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Wood v. WredeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Frazer v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Eaton v. MalatestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Star Mill and Lumber Co. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API