Wagner v. Hansen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This action was brought to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant M. Hansen appeals from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.
In his complaint plaintiff avers that he agreed with defendants “ to furnish, and did furnish, the labor at their special instance and request in completing the foundation of said premises, build the chimneys, laying wall-plates, laying out building, underpinning walls, building scaffolding, carrying brick, completing brick walls and brick foundation upon said dwelling-house, upon said lot of land, and for all which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Wood v. WredeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Frazer v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Eaton v. MalatestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by24 opinions
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Star Mill and Lumber Co. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.