Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Minturn

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1920No. Civ. No. 3045PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Geo. E. ' Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor for the sum of $892.01, in an action instituted by plaintiff against the representatives of the estate of James W. Minturn, deceased, for the purpose of establishing the validity of a rejected claim presented against said estate by plaintiff for a balance claimed to be due upon a mutual, open, and current account. Minturn died on May 27, 1917. Defendants deny the indebtedness, aver payment, and plead the statute of limitations.

The question of the application of the statute of limitations depends…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cowdery v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Norton v. LarcoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Roche v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Robertson v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Cromer v. StriebyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Gordon v. PfeifferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API