Legal Opinion

Corbett v. Plymouth Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1996No. Docket Nos. 97085, 97599, 102521PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The question presented concerns statutory coordination of weekly worker’s compensation benefits with a lump sum paid to the employee pursuant to his election for early withdrawal, in full liquidation of his interest, from a pension or retirement program established or maintained by his employer.

The statute1 provides that the employer’s obligation to remit weekly worker’s compensation payments shall be reduced by the proportion of payments, “with *529respect to the same time period” as the worker’s compensation payment, from a pension or retirement program represented by the employer’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Zaremba v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Murphy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Darling v. Inter City TruckingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Zgnilec v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Vernon v. Controlled Temperature, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Agnes N Cramer v. Transitional Health Services of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API