Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. 96265, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Today we are called upon to consider the duration of the total dependency presumption in cases involving minors entitled to death benefits under § 321 of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act. The language of the statutes at issue makes clear that the conclusive presumption of dependency automatically terminates at the end of the statutorily mandated 500-week period. Thereafter, the continuation of benefits to dependents under a certain age is a discretionary decision of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission. A discretionary decision to continue benefits requires a factual finding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Johnnie F Shinholster v. Annapolis HospMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API