Legal Opinion

Pingue v. Franklin County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1999No. 98-1494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

Pingue contends that his purchase of the forty-four parcels within thirteen months of the tax lien date established the best evidence of true value. We agree. Consequently, we find that the BTA acted unreasonably and unlawfully, and we reverse the decision of the BTA.

R.C. 5713.03 requires that the auditor, when determining the true value of any tract, lot, or parcel of real estate, shall consider the sale price as the true value for taxation purposes if the property has been the subject of an arm’s-length sale between a willing seller and a willing buyer within a reasonable length of time,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Columbus Board of Education v. Fountain Square Associates, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. FirstCal Industrial 2 Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Dublin City Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. St. Bernard Self-Storage, L.L.C. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. HIN, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Bedford Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API