Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Goldberg

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 30, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

This is an application by counsel for the widow for an allowance under section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act for services performed by him in connection with a proceeding which he denominates as one for “ construction ” within the terminology of the statute. His opponents adopt the position that not only is his characterization of the nature of the proceeding incorrect, but that even were the reverse to be granted, the sum which he requests is exorbitant.

The facts underlying the controversy are that incident to the. accounting by the executors, a determination was requested as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of McCaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In Re the Accounting of GoldbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of HowellsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. In re the Adoption of ManziNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SeyfriedNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  2. In re the Estate of SchnitzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  3. In re the Estate of LibermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API