Legal Opinion

Doupnik v. General Motors Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1990No. C002199PublishedCited by 37 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

Defendant General Motors Corporation (General Motors) challenges a jury verdict which found that a defect in the welds of a roof pillar of a car it manufactured was a legal cause of its collapse in an accident, rendering plaintiff Gary Doupnik a quadriplegic (causing thereby a loss of consortium to his wife, plaintiff Sally Doupnik).

The accident occurred when Gary Doupnik, while intoxicated, lost control of his Oldsmobile; it left the road and plunged down a rocky embankment and overturned, coming to rest on its roof. The driver’s side of the roof collapsed from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Self v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Pannu v. Land Rover North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. People v. HolmbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API