Legal Opinion

Illinois Bankers Life Assurance Co. v. Brydia

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1937No. 26939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

The plaintiff, Illinois Bankers Life Assurance . Company, commenced this action to foreclose a re'al estate mortgage. The defendants interposed the defense that the mortgage is void for the re.ason that the mortgagee required the mortgagors to pay the mortgage tax, in violation of section 12354, O. S. 1931, which makes it 'a misdemeanor for the mortgagee to require the mortgagor to pay the tax. The record shows that the action arose under the following circumstances:

The plaintiff, an Illinois corporation with its home office in that state, owned a farm in Oklahoma. The defendants, F. F.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knebel v. RennieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Walters Nat. Bank v. BantockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Whittington Park Amusement Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Venisek v. DraskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Edmund v. Browne v. R & R Engineering Co., a Corporation of the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Sabin v. LevorsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Camp v. Black Gold Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Edmund v. Browne v. R & R Engineering Co., a Corporation of the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API