Legal Opinion
Edmund v. Browne v. R & R Engineering Co., a Corporation of the State of Delaware
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 18, 1959No. 12687PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment which denied the appellant compensation for certain services on the ground that the services were rendered pursuant to an agreement contrary to public policy and prohibited by Executive Order No. 9001.1
In his complaint against R & R Engineering Co., appellant Browne alleged that “from February, 1956 until October, 1956, plaintiff performed certain engineering and other services for defendant in connection with three quotations submitted to a contractor, by defendant, *221* * * » jje asked the court to award him compensation for these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Steele v. DrummondSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Valdes v. LarrinagaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Mitchell v. Flintkote Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.