Reif v. Morrison
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Chief Justice.
The question here presented is whether the first amended complaint of plaintiff and appellant stated a cause of action. It is not important whether the pleading of defendant and appellee by which he attacked the amended complaint may be called a demurrer or motion for judgment on the pleadings, the question becomes one of simply testing the legal sufficiency of the facts pleaded by the amended complaint.
Without undertaking to set out in full the matters alleged in the amended complaint (hereafter to be referred to as the complaint), it may be said that the following…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miles v. A. Arena & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- O'Neill v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Garland v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
- Wolfsen v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Wood v. SloanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. AndermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Bouldin v. SategnaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Lujan v. ReedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Valdez v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.