Legal Opinion
CITY OF GENESEO. v. Utilities Plus
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 2, 2008No. 07-2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
The City of Geneseo (City) appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on its claims for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, promissory es-toppel, and fraud against Utilities Plus (UP). We affirm.
I
The complex factual background of this case is set forth at length in the district court’s opinion. City of Geneseo v. Utils. Plus, No. 05-2689, 2007 WL 1027294 (D.Minn. Apr.3, 2007). Thus, we only briefly summarize those facts necessary for resolution of the issues before our court.
A
UP is a municipal joint powers organization under Minn.Stat. § 471.59,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Fatma Floyd v. State of Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services, Rehabilitation Services for the Blind Gary Stenger, in His Official Capacity Carmen Schulz, in Her Official and Individual Capacity for the Missouri Rehabilitation Services for the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City ofDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Service Restoration, Inc. v. Evanston Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025