Grud v. Warren

Separate actions by husband and wife to recover damages for personal injuries received in a collision between their automobile and a truck were tried together to a jury, with verdicts and judgments for defendant.

Motions for new trials were denied and plaintiffs review by appeal.

When the cases were called for trial, and jurors were not present, counsel for defendant conceded that their client was, to some extent, insured by the General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., with its foreign office in Perth, Scotland, and its office in this country at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Counse…