Legal Opinion

Fedorinchik v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1939No. Docket No. 64, Calendar No. 39,742PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The decisive question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff, against whom the jury rendered a verdict, was erroneously deprived of a fair examination of the jurors on their voi¥ dire. Plaintiff’s suit arises out of an automobile accident which occurred while defendant was insured in the Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange, a mutual insurance company. The suit was defended by the insurance company’s attorneys. The circuit judge, acting under Court Rule No. 37, § 1 (1933), conducted the voir dire examination of the jurors. Before the jury was drawn, he was advised by plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Church v. StoldtMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. William R. Roach & Co. v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Martin v. Farmers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NassarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. People v. TyburskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Darr v. BuckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API