Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANEY, J.
Plaintiff and respondent, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (Travelers), filed this action for declaratory relief seeking a *972determination that there was no potential for coverage under its policy, and therefore no duty to defend its insureds, Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., Charlotte Russe Merchandising, Inc., David Mussafer, Jenny J. Ming, Advent International Corporation, Advent CR Holdings, Inc., and Advent CR, Inc. (the Charlotte Russe parties), in litigation against them by Versatile Entertainment, Inc., and its parent, People’s Liberation, Inc.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- La Jolla Beach & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Genesis Ins. v. BRE PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Michael Taylor Designs, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- San Miguel Community Ass'n v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Premier Pools Mgmt. Corp. v. Colony Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.